@prefix : <http://semanticscholar.org/cv-research/> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix fhir_link: <http://hl7.org/fhir/link/> .
@prefix ncit: <http://ncicb.nci.nih.gov/xml/owl/EVS/Thesaurus.owl#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix sso: <http://semanticscholar.org/cv-research/> .
@prefix whocv: <http://semanticscholar.org/cv-research/WHO#> .
@prefix xml: <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<http://fhircat.org/cord-19/metadata/b35c5f90e09d90f6fd6cff9dab355755e4c33fe4> fhir_link: <https://fhircat.org/cord-19/fhir/Commercial/b35c5f90e09d90f6fd6cff9dab355755e4c33fe4> ;
    dc:abstract "BACKGROUND: Whether information sources influence health protective behaviours during influenza pandemics or other emerging infectious disease epidemics is uncertain. METHODOLOGY: Data from cross-sectional telephone interviews of 1,001 Hong Kong adults in June, 2009 were tested against theory and data-derived hypothesized associations between trust in (formal/informal) information, understanding, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility and worry, and hand hygiene and social distancing using Structural Equation Modelling with multigroup comparisons. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Trust in formal (government/media) information about influenza was associated with greater reported understanding of A/H1N1 cause (β = 0.36) and A/H1N1 prevention self-efficacy (β = 0.25), which in turn were associated with more hand hygiene (β = 0.19 and β = 0.23, respectively). Trust in informal (interpersonal) information was negatively associated with perceived personal A/H1N1 susceptibility (β = −0.21), which was negatively associated with perceived self-efficacy (β = −0.42) but positively associated with influenza worry (β = 0.44). Trust in informal information was positively associated with influenza worry (β = 0.16) which was in turn associated with greater social distancing (β = 0.36). Multigroup comparisons showed gender differences regarding paths from trust in formal information to understanding of A/H1N1 cause, trust in informal information to understanding of A/H1N1 cause, and understanding of A/H1N1 cause to perceived self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Trust in government/media information was more strongly associated with greater self-efficacy and handwashing, whereas trust in informal information was strongly associated with perceived health threat and avoidance behaviour. Risk communication should consider the effect of gender differences." ;
    dc:creator "['Liao, Qiuyan', 'Cowling, Benjamin', 'Lam, Wing Tak', 'Ng, Man Wai', 'Fielding, Richard']" ;
    dc:identifier <http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013350>,
        <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953514>,
        <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20967280> ;
    dc:issued "2010-01-01"^^xsd:date ;
    dc:license "CC BY" ;
    dc:title "Situational Awareness and Health Protective Responses to Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study" ;
    sso:has_full_text "True" ;
    sso:journal "PLoS One" ;
    sso:sha "b35c5f90e09d90f6fd6cff9dab355755e4c33fe4" ;
    sso:source_x "PMC" .