@prefix : <http://semanticscholar.org/cv-research/> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix fhir_link: <http://hl7.org/fhir/link/> .
@prefix ncit: <http://ncicb.nci.nih.gov/xml/owl/EVS/Thesaurus.owl#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix sso: <http://semanticscholar.org/cv-research/> .
@prefix whocv: <http://semanticscholar.org/cv-research/WHO#> .
@prefix xml: <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4420> dc:abstract "\"Without freedom of speech there is no modern world, just a barbaric one.” These words from China's most famous artist and activist, Ai Weiwei, have never been more important. Ai Weiwei would probably agree that China's actions in the coronavirus crisis require the voice of the scientific community, and he wouldn't be surprised that getting folks to say something has been a challenge. I didn't want to be the person to write this editorial. I felt that it would best come from someone inside China with a direct connection to the situation. Such a person could help dispel or reinforce the scraps of information coming from the intrepid journalists and the few courageous eyewitnesses. But over the past few weeks, I've been discouraged by the responses of such individuals who declined or didn't respond to an invitation to write a forthcoming editorial about China's secrecy on coronavirus. Some of these scientists and experts even expressed doubt that I'd find such a gutsy author at any organization in China to write such a piece." ;
    dc:creator "Thorp, H. Holden" ;
    dc:identifier <https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/245508297>,
        <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4420> ;
    dc:issued "2020-01-01"^^xsd:date ;
    dc:title "The costs of secrecy" ;
    sso:WHO "#2531" ;
    sso:journal "Science" ;
    sso:source_x "CZI" .